=E2=80=9CWe must educate to survive, critiqu= e and create.=E2=80=9D (Berry, as cited in O=E2=80=99Sullivan, 1999, p. 8)=

Transformative educators such as Thomas Berry, Brian Swimme, and=20 Edmund O=E2=80=99Sullivan believe that the time has come for a shift away= from=20 the dominant Western educational ideology that focuses on achievement,=20 individualism, and material success. They propose that education=20 must become more than a system of banking information and standardized=20 testing, and educators must be prepared to operate out of a much larger=20 integrated worldview. They suggest that schools must provide=20 balanced non-dualistic education that values students more for who they=20 are than what they can achieve. In June 2008, the Saskatchewan=20 Ministry of Education published a document which addresses similar=20 concerns to those raised by Berry, Swimme, and O=E2=80=99Sullivan. Th= e=20 document entitled Renewed Objectives for the Common Essential=20 Learning of Critical and Creative Thinking (CCT) and Personal and Social Development (PSD) recommends a number of key changes to existing=20 educational policy in the areas of emotional, social and spiritual=20 formation. The recommendations place emphasis on spiritual=20 development, environmental awareness, ecological principles, human=20 diversity, creative-ability development, and community-based=20 achievement. This paper analyzes the educational need for renewal=20 of current Western ideology and it supports the revamping of policy as=20 proposed by the 2008 Ministry of Education document. It also=20 discusses how the three principles of O=E2=80=99Sullivan=E2=80=99s (1999)= integral=20 development theory towards transformative education may be helpful for=20 enhancing the effective implementation of the 2008 CCT and PSD Ministry=20 of Education document.

Keywords: integrated education, transforma= tive education

Author Name(s)

Barbara Wotherspoon

Integral Development and Educational Renewal in Saskatche= wan:
A Visionary Process

Last spring, I had the occasion to watch some=20 kindergarten-aged children play a game of soccer. One team was=20 wearing red vests and the other was in blue. The teacher was=20 showing the children how one team could win by getting the ball away=20 from the other team in order to score points. Two little girls=20 forgot that they were supposed to be playing an organized sport; they=20 were completely absorbed in smelling, touching, and talking to a group=20 of flowers that had managed to avoid being trampled. The teacher=20 encouraged them to come back to the game, and when they hesitated, she=20 physically picked them up and pointed them in the direction that they=20 were to run. Although I could see the benefits of being outside=20 and being involved in physical exercise, I also felt a bit saddened=20 because so early in their education, these youngsters were being=20 introduced to standardization, competition, and disconnection from the=20 natural world. I could only hope that the school system would not=20 destroy their sense of awe, mystery, and imaginative play. (B.=20 Wotherspoon, personal communication, 2010)

In June 2008, the Saskatchewan Ministry of Educatio= n published a document entitled Renewed Objectives for the Common Essential Learning of Critical and Creative=20 Thinking (CCT) and Personal and Social Development (PSD). =20 Headed by project developer and writer, Dr. Sandra Finney, a committee=20 of 30 provincial curriculum developers recommended a number of key=20 changes to existing educational policy. The renewal process=20 involved renaming policy on Personal and Social Values and Skills (PSVS= ) to Personal and Social Development (PSD) in order to emphasize the developmental aspect of education in the area of emotional, social, and spiritual formation. It also involved=20 synthesizing the objectives of the common essential learning of Persona= l and Social Development (PSD) with that of Critical and Creative= Thinking (CCT) in a way that informed and strengthened each area, and targeted=20 elements of CCT, PSD, and integrated CCT/PSD. In addition, the=20 renewal committee placed emphasis on spiritual development,=20 environmental awareness, ecological principles, human diversity,=20 creative-ability development, and community-based achievement. The project was developed on the basis of 12 holistic, value-based=20 underlying assumptions, and the document that was produced contains=20 thorough explanations of the learning objectives, as well as substantial teacher guidelines, checklists, summaries, sample activities,=20 mini-lessons, and resource suggestions for implementing CCT, PSD, and=20 integrated CCT/PSD. What the document does not contain is an=20 analysis of the educational need for a revamping of policy prior to=20 2008, or a discussion of the critical conceptual work of the committee=20 members as they undertook the task of renewal. In addition,=20 although the document states that it is directed towards the members of=20 school communities and is meant to stimulate thinking, raise awareness,=20 focus questions and dialogue, and facilitate understanding about CCT and PSD, the committee does not recommend a philosophical framework within=20 which such discourse can take place.

This paper reviews three key concepts in an=20 integral developmental approach for building toward the renewal=20 envisioned by Finney (2008) and her committee. Education towards=20 integral development as proposed by O=E2=80=99Sullivan (1999) in Transf= ormative Learning is rooted in the work of Thomas Berry (1988), a renowned =E2=80=9Cecologia= n,=E2=80=9D=20 who has developed the Twelve Principles for the Understanding of the=20 Universe. Integral development is grounded in Berry=E2=80=99s fourth= =20 principle, which states: The three basic laws of the universe at all=20 levels of reality are differentiation, subjectivity, and=20 communion. These laws identify the reality of the universe, the=20 values of the universe, and the direction in which the universe is=20 proceeding. At this critical moment in Earth=E2=80=99s history, O=E2= =80=99Sullivan explains that these three principles are not evolving as they should=20 because humans have disrupted the order of the natural world by placing=20 themselves above all other living things and causing mass destruction in the natural world. In order to realign the values of the=20 individual with the proper ordering of the universe, O=E2=80=99Sullivan, al= ong=20 with Swimme and Berry (1992), recommend putting into practice the=20 principles of differentiation, subjectivity, and communion. =20 Differentiation celebrates the uniqueness of all life forms;=20 subjectivity assumes that each being is a subject with a will to live=20 and an attunement to its environment, and communion acknowledges the=20 interconnection of all living things. When applied to education,=20 the essence of these three evolving principles parallels the Twelve=20 Assumptions underlying the Saskatchewan Ministry of Education document.

Twelve Assumptions: Assessment and Analysis Warranted

Finney=E2=80=99s (2008) committee members list 12=20 Assumptions that form the basis of the renewal project, but their=20 document does not give a background explanation of the reasons that=20 change in educational policy is necessary. Their assumptions stand without any reference to past educational practices; they address the=20 present modern-day need to create an educational atmosphere that is=20 consistent with the democratic and multicultural nature of Saskatchewan=20 society, a total school atmosphere in which people live their values and work together for the common good. Finney=E2=80=99s committee sugges= ts a=20 process by which school staffs and school communities might discuss=20 these 12 Assumptions. They acknowledge that the assumptions will=20 not be accepted by all, and they realize that some may challenge the=20 values and beliefs proposed in the renewal document. They=20 recommend those involved in discussions about the assumptions respect=20 each other=E2=80=99s viewpoints and accept disagreements as part of the=20 democratic process, and they encourage local groups to use disagreements as opportunities to learn and grow together and to share with others=20 who are undertaking renewal.

Assumptions 7, 8, and 9 address the need for=20 spiritual development because =E2=80=9Chumans are more than minds in bodies= ,=E2=80=9D=20 and =E2=80=9Chuman spirit is an essential aspect of wholeness=E2=80=9D (Fin= ney, 2008, p. 11). Assumption 4 states that no education is =E2=80=9Cvalue free=E2= =80=9D=20 (Finney, 2008, p. 10). It expresses a belief in democracy,=20 equality, social justice, and lifelong learning; it recognizes a need=20 for independence, self-responsibility, living together in harmony, and=20 sustaining life on the planet; and it emphasizes respect for all people=20 and the environment. Assumption 1 states a need for improvement=20 and sustainability towards a better quality of daily life, and=20 Assumption 10 stresses a need for education that focuses on an=20 understanding of biodiversity and practices related to sustaining the=20 natural environment. Assumption 2 states that because the=20 school is a microcosm of larger society, PSD caters to the needs that=20 arise from =E2=80=9Csocial ills=E2=80=9D of society. Assumptions 3,= 5, and 6=20 stress a need for a safe, respectful educational atmosphere where=20 students can learn through questioning, making mistakes, and=20 constructing personal meaning and purpose. Assumption 11 concludes that =E2=80=9Cattainment of values, attitudes, and disposition can neither= be=20 forced or [sic] guaranteed=E2=80=9D (Finney, 2008, p. 12), and Assumption= 12=20 describes the interdependent and interrelated nature of CCT and PSD.

Although the vision that is proposed by the=20 renewal document does not analyze reasons for necessary change, it=20 warrants some understanding of the broad context of the need for=20 transformative education in today=E2=80=99s mechanistic Western society.&nb= sp;=20 O=E2=80=99Sullivan (1999) proposes that =E2=80=9C[o]ne of the preparations= for the=20 future is a sober assessment of the past, to see how the forces of the=20 past are operating in the present moment=E2=80=9D (p. 47). In order= that=20 educators might undergo such assessment, it is necessary that they fully understand and confront the historical development of current=20 educational mechanistic practices that mandate a need for renewal. The provision of transformative education requires a creative and=20 critical consciousness of the worldview that has caused many of the=20 problems that exist in modern day schools. Purpel and McLaurin=20 (2004) and O=E2=80=99Sullivan (1999) provide the background information=20 necessary for educators to critically deconstruct educational practices=20 that foster and support a mechanistic world view.

Mechanistic World View: The Root of Educational Crisis Fr= om Two Perspectives

In Reflections on The Moral and Spirit= ual Crisis in Education, Purpel and McLaurin (2004) state that educators =E2=80=9Cmust have the cou= rage=20 not only to examine the nature and impact of [Western] culture but also to consider how [they] as individuals reflect the values and norms of the culture=E2=80=9D (p. 73). Purpel and McLaurin offer insights= about educational realities that work against the type of holistic=20 value-based educational principles that Finney=E2=80=99s (2008) committee= has=20 developed. Purpel and McLaurin describe three complex moral and=20 spiritual paradoxes that currently exist in middleclass Western=20 educational institutions:

Individualism/Community: Schools promote the growth of school spirit, school identity and school community, but they place=20 much more emphasis on the development of personal identity, success and=20 achievement (One only has to look at the practice of individual grading=20 and standardized testing to realize the truth of this reality). =20 This focus on personal success is =E2=80=9Chighly inappropriate preparation= for=20 an interdependent world in which the sense of justice, community, and=20 compassion should be the overriding consideration=E2=80=9D (Purpel &=20 McLaurin, 2004, p. 46).

Worth/Achievement: School policies stress the=20 worth, dignity and uniqueness of each individual and they strongly=20 discourage behaviours that create situations of unfairness or=20 inequality, but at the same time, school practices often equate human=20 worth and dignity with achievement. =E2=80=9CThe schools mirror the culture= by=20 giving its powerfully symbolic rewards to those who achieve more than=20 others=E2=80=A6this conviction must coexist with=E2=80=A6our intense desire= to=E2=80=A6.love=20 others for who they are rather than for what they do or have=E2=80=9D (Purp= el=20 & McLaurin, 2004, p. 50).

Equality/Competition: An emphasis on individualism, competition, personal achievement and success works against the=20 commitment to social equality. In shaky economic times, people are forced to make a choice between justice for all and personal=20 survival. In schools, students confront a number of conflicting=20 choices that mirror societal paradoxes.
Purpel and McLaurin (2004) also explore a number of conflicts that=20 result when moral principles clash with educational practices, and=20 although they are directed towards American education, many of their=20 insights provide compelling reasons for educators to seriously consider=20 Finney=E2=80=99s (2008) committee=E2=80=99s objectives for educational rene= wal in=20 Saskatchewan. Some of the paradoxical dilemmas that Purpel and=20 McLaurin present are as follows:

=E2=80=A2 Humans value giving and= =20 receiving compassion, but schools which stress individualism and=20 achievement often promote sentimentality, which =E2=80=9Cdistances=E2=80=9D= and=20 =E2=80=9Cdehumanizes=E2=80=9D the processes of mutuality, interdependence,= and social=20 responsibility.

=E2=80=A2 Schools concentrate mor= e on=20 the unhealthy aspects of acting out of guilt than of =E2=80=9Chelping peopl= e to=20 sort out their legitimate responsibilities and contribute to the=20 development of the intellectual, psychological, and spiritual resources=20 required to respond in a way that is fulfilling and meaningful=E2=80=9D (Pu= rpel=20 & McLaurin, 2004, p. 57).

=E2=80=A2 Schools value critical= =20 thinking, but at the same time put great stress on their own authority=20 and power. Students are generally not allowed to be critical of=20 their school environment.

=E2=80=A2 Schools which formerly= integrated democracy and education (see Dewey,1916,) are now controlled by= accountability (efficiency, productivity, discipline), and= as a result, are more concerned with raising standards than with= instilling values towards responsible citizenship.

=E2=80=A2 Western education faces= a=20 clash between a genuine belief in a common humanity and a suspicion of=20 people from different cultures.

=E2=80=A2 True education requires= =20 questioning and developing one=E2=80=99s own beliefs, but schools are rigid= in=20 their =E2=80=9Csameness=E2=80=9D and in their =E2=80=9Cright answers=E2=80= =9D. This arrogance=20 reflects a lack of humility, which is caused by a loss of faith that=20 comes from those who are unable to find meaning and direction in=20 life. Schools, which should overcome alienation, actually nurture=20 it by demanding that students adhere to educational pursuits that hold=20 no interest for them.

=E2=80=A2 In their concern for=20 facilitating the individual pursuit of socioeconomic success, schools=20 have become institutions that foster alienation rather than places that=20 help students find meaning and fulfillment in life.

=E2=80=A2 Taking responsibility= for=20 reacting to the transgressions of the culture works against complacency=20 in education.

=E2=80=A2 =E2=80=9CPseudoscience,= narrowly=20 defined academic goals, and predetermined answers are antithetical to=20 serious educational inquiry, but they are excellent ways of facilitating the emphasis on grading and competition. They are effective=20 control mechanisms and give a legitimate flavour to the hierarchical=20 power structure in schools. Thus, schools are not terribly=20 interested in faith or reason, truth or wisdom, but use them as part of=20 the rhetoric of justifying the direction of enormous energy to the=20 rather vulgar duty of helping people to make money and raise their=20 status=E2=80=9D (Purpel & McLaurin, 2004, p. 71).

=E2=80=A2 Educators must confront= the=20 human impulse for self-deception and have the wisdom to discern its=20 destructiveness. They must remember that they are both the cause=20 and the effect of the system.

In Transformative Learning, O=E2=80=99Sull= ivan=20 (1999) reiterates Purpel and McLaurin=E2=80=99s (2004) arguments that educa= tors=20 have a =E2=80=9Cspecific responsibility for forging a broad educational bel= ief=20 system=E2=80=9D (p. 272), and he challenges educators to =E2=80=9Center int= o a deep=20 cultural and personal reflection on educational paradigms that are=20 operating at the deeper levels of consciousness=E2=80=9D (p. 8). Like= =20 Purpel and McLaurin, O=E2=80=99Sullivan (1999) is critical of formal educat= ional institutions that are =E2=80=9Ctailored to the needs of the consumer indus= trial society=E2=80=9D (p. 43), but he identifies the current educational crisis= as=20 one in which schools are being structured to encourage the exploitation=20 of the natural world to meet human consumption. O=E2=80=99Sullivan=20 addresses the need for environmental sustainability that also appears as a renewal objective in the Saskatchewan Ministry of Education=20 document. He claims =E2=80=9Cthe fundamental educational task of our= times is to make the choice for a sustainable global planetary habitat of=20 interdependent life forms over and against the global competitive=20 marketplace=E2=80=9D (O=E2=80=99Sullivan , 1999, p. 45). He believes= that we are=20 living in a time of transition, and he advocates a =E2=80=9Cradical=20 restructuring of all current educational directions=E2=80=9D (O=E2=80=99Sul= livan, 1999,=20 p. 45). He recommends that a transformative and visionary=20 educational framework is necessary for the movement to shift from=20 product-oriented, individualized educational pursuits to organic,=20 connected, value-based educational processes.

O=E2=80=99Sullivan (1999) proposes that what contem= porary=20 education lacks is a cosmological component that can =E2=80=9Cbe functional= ly=20 effective in providing a basis for an educational programme that would=20 engender an ecologically sustainable vision of society in the broadest=20 terms; what can be called a planetary vision=E2=80=9D (p. 4). He quot= es=20 Abram (1996), who in The Spell of the Sensuous, discusses the lack= of such a vision:

Clearly, something is terribly missing, some essential=20 ingredient has been neglected, some necessary aspect of life has been=20 dangerously overlooked, set aside, or simply forgotten in the rush=20 toward a common world. In order to obtain the astonishing and=20 unifying image of the whole earth whirling in the darkness of space,=20 humans, it would seem, have had to relinquish something just as=20 valuable=E2=80=94the humility and grace that comes from being fully a part= of=20 that whirling world. We have forgotten the poise that comes from=20 living in storied relation and reciprocity with the myriad things, the=20 myriad beings, that perceptually surround us=E2=80=A6If we do not soon reme= mber=20 ourselves to our sensuous surroundings, if we do not reclaim our=20 solidarity with the other sensibilities that inhabit and constitute=20 those surroundings, then the cost of our human commonality may be our=20 common extinction. (pp. 270-71)

O=E2=80=99Sullivan (1999) believes that the=20 pre-eminent view of the world as a machine has led to the human=20 disconnection with the wider biotic community and the natural=20 world. He contrasts the mechanistic world view with that of=20 Indigenous world views which have historically regarded the earth as a=20 sacred, a spiritual, and a nurturing source of life which is intricately connected to humans and all other life forms. He states that a=20 mechanistic map of the universe can no longer be used towards=20 understanding the workings of the world, and he calls for a frame of=20 reference that allows for the development of =E2=80=9Ca profoundly holistic= and=20 integral education that moves beyond mechanistic atomism=E2=80=9D (O=E2=80= =99Sullivan,=20 1999, p. 75). This framework is called integral development. To ensure that Renewed Objectives for the Common Essential Learning of Critical and Creative Thinking (CCT) and Personal and Social=20 Development (PSD) are interpreted and implemented within a=20 framework that supports the creative regenerations of educational=20 practices in the areas of spiritual development, environmental=20 awareness, ecological principles, human diversity, creative-ability=20 development, and community-based achievement, this paper advocates the=20 consideration of differentiation, subjectivity and communion, the three=20 principles of integral development.

The Integral Development Framework: A Transformative Visi= on of Education

In an attempt to articulate a vision of=20 transformation that transcends the limitations of Western systems,=20 O=E2=80=99Sullivan (1999) suggests that the term =E2=80=9Cintegral=E2=80=9D= goes beyond=20 =E2=80=9Cholistic,=E2=80=9D in that it allows for the existence of harmony= and=20 disharmony within a creative system where all living forms evolve; the=20 word development =E2=80=9Cpresumes that all living processes are always in= =20 dynamic states of growth, decay and transformation=E2=80=9D (p. 208). = =20 O=E2=80=99Sullivan theorizes that humans need to develop a consciousness of= the=20 three creative evolutionary principles of differentiation, subjectivity, and communion, as set out by the fourth universal principle of Berry=20 (1984). The tendencies of differentiation, subjectivity, and=20 communion identify the values and the realities that continually find=20 expressions as the universe undergoes constant sequences of=20 transformation. Berry and Swimme (1992) contend that in the=20 context of transformation in the last century, humans have savagely=20 plundered the earth by industrial exploitation, and as a result, the=20 existence of a vast number of species, including the human species is=20 now being threatened. The time has come for humans to become aware of our proper relationship to the planet and to the universe, and to=20 recognize that the needs and rights of the planet are the needs and=20 rights of the human. This personal consciousness raising involves=20 understanding the interrelated principles of integral development, which at the most basic level defines the essence of creativity.

About differentiation, O=E2=80=99Sullivan (1999) st= ates: =E2=80=9CThe cosmological task embedded in the process of differe= ntiation is to articulate in the most developed sense who we are as persons and=20 who we are as specific communities=E2=80=9D (p. 223). The human speci= es=20 has arisen from the matrix of the earth, and humans are just one=20 component of a vast multitude of living beings that have risen from the=20 same earth. Within humanity, differentiation is evident within the tremendous variety of people from different ages, genders, races,=20 ethnic backgrounds, and cultures. When the principle of=20 differentiation is considered within the educational system, it=20 celebrates that all students are unique multi-faceted beings that are=20 gifted with inner intelligibility, individual identity, and a unique set of intellectual and creative abilities. In addition, it specifies that each student has a unique history in time and place; each=20 represents a particular social, familial, ethnic, economic, racial,=20 gender-based perspective, and each has an open destiny that is yet to be formed. Swimme (2001) explains, =E2=80=9CEach being [is] glistening= with=20 freshness ontologically unique, never to be repeated. Each being=20 is required. None can be eliminated or ignored, for not one is=20 redundant=E2=80=9D (p. 61-62). Differentiation recognizes that all sc= hool=20 communities possess distinctive histories, capabilities, and=20 possibilities. No two students and no two school communities can=20 ever be the same, and education must be a process of evolutionary=20 re-creation that meets the constantly changing needs of those it serves=20 as it transforms itself in relation to the needs of the rest of the=20 world. =E2=80=9CThe radical nature of differentiation is the creativi= ty=20 which brings with it the burden of being and becoming=E2=80=A6unique in=20 different ways from all that exists in the present and all that has=20 existed in the past or that will exist in the future=E2=80=9D (O=E2=80=99Su= llivan, 1999=20 p. 223).

In describing the principle of subjectivity, O=E2=80=99Sullivan (1999) explores an organic aspect of all living speci= es that works against mechanistic tendencies to objectify non-human beings. Subjectivity gives each living being an=20 interior identity and formation, an inner spontaneity, an indwelling=20 self, and a connection with the ultimate mystery of the cosmos. =20 The universe consists of subjects such as elements, plants, animals, and humans, all of which are centres of spontaneity and sentience= . Spontaneity is the ability of a living subject to organize itself, and=20 species at all levels of the living universe are capable of=20 self-organization and self-regulation. Sentience is the innermost=20 ability to feel and to experience. There are several opinions=20 about which species are capable of this quality, ranging from only=20 humans, to only mammals, to all living beings. O=E2=80=99Sullivan agr= ees=20 with Swimme and Berry (1992) who assume that all visible matter has the=20 capacity for sentience. When spontaneity and sentience work=20 together, the groundwork for the processes of integral development is=20 established. O=E2=80=99Sullivan(1999) and Swimme and Berry(1992), con= sider that the ethical imperative of subjectivity is for humans to=20 acknowledge their intimacy with other living things on the earth. =20 This requires a transformation that begins from within. =20 Abram (1996) calls for a =E2=80=9Crejuvenation of our carnal, sensorial emp= athy=20 with the living land that sustains us,=E2=80=9D by acknowledging the recipr= ocal=20 nature of direct perception which presumes that =E2=80=9C[e]ach of us [huma= n and non-human] is both subject and object, sensible and sentient=E2=80=9D (p.= =20 67). About perceptual reciprocity, he states: =E2=80=9C[It] may profo= undly influence one=E2=80=99s behaviour. If the surroundings are experienc= ed as sensate, attentive and watchful, that I must take care that my actions=20 are mindful and respectful, even when I am far from other humans, lest I offend the watchful land itself=E2=80=9D (Abram, 1996, p. 69). James= =20 Conlon, an advocate for Geo-Justice, believes that one=E2=80=99s= inner=20 psyche is directly connected to the inner harmony of the planet; Conlon=20 (1990) states: =E2=80=9CAs our awareness of the Earth deepens, we often und= ergo=20 profound changes=E2=80=A6The energy of our new awareness must be invested= in=20 transforming ourselves as well as structures and systems=E2=80=9D (p.=20 76-77). Conlon believes that the ethical imperative of=20 subjectivity is to connect one=E2=80=99s fragmented inner life with the=20 separateness of the cosmos in a way that promotes inner harmony and=20 planetary peace. Deborah Orr, who has studied the work of=20 philosophers Wittgenstein and Nagarjuna, believes that the mandate of=20 subjectivity is soul development; Orr (as cited in Miller, 2005) defines the human soul as an embodied entity that is designed for intimacy in=20 relationship with all that surrounds it, human and non-human (p.=20 234). O=E2=80=99Sullivan (1999) calls this intimacy the sacred depth= of=20 =E2=80=9Cthe soul=E2=80=9D ( p. 261) which carries the =E2=80=9Cnuminous my= stery=E2=80=9D of the=20 universe (p. 232).

In terms of transformative education, subjectivity is the most controversial principle of integral development because of=20 the spiritual aspect of its implementation. O=E2=80=99Sullivan (1999)= =20 emphasizes, however, the essential need for education towards the=20 nourishment of the =E2=80=9Cnon-physical, immaterial=E2=80=A6energies, esse= nces and part of us that existed before and will continue to exist after the=20 disintegration of the body=E2=80=9D (pp. 259-60). He states: =E2=80= =9C[E]ducators=20 must take on the concern of the development of the spirit at a most=20 fundamental level=E2=80=9D (O=E2=80=99Sullivan, 1999, p. 259). When= the principle=20 of subjectivity is considered within the educational system, it becomes a process of dynamic, human, integral development that begins with the=20 acceptance of each child as a unique individual with interior depth and=20 potential for co-creation. Education then involves aesthetic,=20 emotional, imaginative, moral, and intellectual formation, which targets the development of each child=E2=80=99s interiority, creativity, and=20 spirituality. Educators such as John P. Miller (2005), Thomas=20 Moore (1994), Rachel Kessler (2000), and Leslie Owen Wilson (2004)=20 advocate that in all situations and subject areas, educators must teach=20 the =E2=80=9Cwhole=E2=80=9D child as a person with emotions, intuitions, in= terests,=20 desires, feelings and moods that are integral to his or her being. Teaching must be more than transmitting knowledge; it must employ the=20 art of moral perception (Garrison, 1997), which takes into account the=20 interior aspects of the child=E2=80=99s artistic, intellectual, interperson= al=20 and physical expressions. The principle of subjectivity will work=20 to balance the feelings of fragmentation, disconnection and alienation=20 that our Western culture has created. When students and school=20 communities are valued and validated, then the process of being and=20 becoming can take hold.

This process directly connects to O=E2=80=99Sulliva= n=E2=80=99s=20 (1999) principle of communion. He states: =E2=80=9CTo be, is to be in= =20 relation. Much of our existence finds ultimate fulfillment in=20 relatedness. The intricacy of our personal world is embedded in=20 community=E2=80=9D (p. 192). Within the framework of integral develop= ment, communion, along with differentiation and subjectivity, must exist as a dynamic evolutionary process that organizes and regulates itself. When individualism is overemphasized in the differentiation process,=20 egocentrism results. When the interiority basis of subjectivity is undermined, autism occurs. Both lead to alienation, which is=20 rampant in Western society, where humans find themselves trapped in a=20 world of autonomous individuals that are incapable of connecting with=20 the world outside of themselves. =E2=80=9CEven when there is a sense= of=20 community, the community is limited to the human; the world outside the=20 human is excluded=E2=80=9D (O=E2=80=99Sullivan, 1999 p. 193). O=E2=80= =99Sullivan=E2=80=99s (1999)=20 principle of communion is founded on the concept of the person=20 as an integral component of a deep, relational totality; in other words, there is no sense of the individual as separate from community. =20 O=E2=80=99Sullivan believes that as persons, we have a need for intimacy an= d for being present to one another at our deepest levels of=20 subjectivity. This need extends to the wider context of both our=20 natural world and the entire universe, and it involves the development a reciprocal relationship between subject and object, which he calls=20 =E2=80=9Ccosmological sense=E2=80=9D (p. 226). O=E2=80=99Sullivan tra= ces the three-stage=20 primal matrix of the human in community as developed by Stanislav Grof:=20 (a) Perinatal gives a sense of belonging and trust; (b) I-Cons= ciousness gives a sense of personal integrity, centeredness, and capab= ility; and (c) Transpersonal which gives a sense that self is world and world is self. =20 O=E2=80=99Sullivan (1992) explains that if any of these developments are=20 interrupted, disconnection will result, and he believes that =E2=80=9Ca=20 relationship of communion is an antidote=E2=80=9D (p. 228) for those who ha= ve=20 become alienated from the nurturance of the natural world. He=20 believes that moving beyond the individualized self into an ecological= self with cosmological sense involves communal identification with th= ree entities: the personal (relationships with friends, family, pe= t, school, clubs, nation, continent), the ontological (a deep spir= itual relationship with all existence), and the cosmological (a realization that our unfolding transformative story is the unfolding story of the universe through space and time). About communion=20 and the ecological self, O=E2=80=99Sullivan , (1999) states:

Of one thing we can be sure; our own future is=20 inseparable from the future of the larger life community which brought=20 us into being and sustains us in every expression of our human quality=20 of life; in our aesthetic and emotional sensitivities, in our=20 intellectual perceptions, in our sense of the sacred as well as in our=20 physical nourishment and our bodily healing. (p. 231)

In terms of developing communion, schools and=20 classrooms need to provide supportive, nurturing and forgiving=20 atmospheres whereby students can experiment with interconnective=20 processes of bonding with others and the natural world. School=20 communities must be safe places where all students know they belong and=20 where students are encouraged to develop subjective communication with=20 those who are different. Students need to be taught appreciation=20 and tolerance for both individuals and social structures different from=20 their own, and they need to know that they are capable, connected and=20 contributing members who are responsible to the school community and the wider ecological community. Educating for communion within=20 integral development will allow students to question, explore=20 possibilities and test the limits as they begin to recognize the deep=20 interiority and interconnectedness of all beings; this bonding will=20 foster a paradigm shift in which students will come to realize that the=20 needs of the individual, the needs of the school community and the needs of the earth are interdependent.

O=E2=80=99Sullivan=E2=80=99s (1999) theory of integ= ral development provides a logical framework for educational systems that are in need=20 of re-creation. Transformative education emerges when differentiation,=20 subjectivity and communion, the three principles of creativity, work=20 together simultaneously. An integral developmental framework provides a=20 supportive structure for implementing the educational renewal suggested=20 by the Saskatchewan Ministry of Education Document, Renewed=20 Objectives for the Common Essential Learning of Critical and Creative=20 Thinking (CCT) and Personal and Social Development (PSD).

Educational Renewal: Towards Critical and Creative Thinki= ng, Personal and Social Development, and a Global and Planetary Ethic

The Saskatchewan Ministry of Education=E2=80=99s Co= mmon Essential Learning document entitled Renewed Objectives for the Common Essential Learning of Critical and Creative=20 Thinking (CCT) and Personal and Social Development (PSD) is a 266=20 page educational project that focuses on holistic and value-based=20 emotional, social and spiritual development. When one looks at the elements of CCT, PSD and integrated CCT/PSD, it is evident that=20 practices that foster their implementation will require a framework that supports movement and flexibility within educational systems. An=20 integral development framework will serve as a suitable vehicle for=20 creative and effective implementation of this document for several=20 reasons:

The principles of differentiation, subjectivity and communion=20 provide an excellent theoretical basis for anti-oppressive, anti-racist, anti-sexist education in our province.

The principles of integral development place value on Indigenous=20 ways of knowing and being, and recognize the importance of balanced=20 spiritual, mental, emotional and physical development and lifelong=20 learning.

The principles of integral development celebrate the uniqueness,=20 inner life, and interconnectedness of all cultures that are brought=20 together within the school system. They encourage a =E2=80=9Csharing of sto= ries=E2=80=9D among those who are uniquely different from each other.

The principles of integral development provide a strong=20 philosophical foundation for the creation of safe, respectful classroom=20 and school communities where all people, regardless of intellectual or=20 physical abilities, are respected and valued as capable, contributing,=20 and connected members.

The principles of integral development balance dualized thinking in=20 terms of standardization and competitive educational practices. =20 They present a strong philosophical argument for arts-based education,=20 which celebrates the uniqueness of each individual and gives voice to=20 the =E2=80=9Cinner being=E2=80=9D of each student=E2=80=99s identity. = Educators must have a philosophical framework by which to demonstrate the value of fostering=20 creativity and imagination in their teaching practices.

The principles of integral development balance dualized thinking in=20 terms of multiple intelligences and abilities. They present a=20 strong philosophical argument for the =E2=80=9Cunique giftedness=E2=80=9D= of individuals in the areas of naturalistic intelligence, interpersonal intelligence,=20 intrapersonal intelligence, artistic intelligence, musical intelligence=20 and kinesthetic intelligence (Gardner, 1993). In an era where all=20 students are evaluated by the =E2=80=9Csame=E2=80=9D means of verbal/lingui= stic and=20 mathematical intelligences, the principles of integral development=20 present a valid argument for assessment and evaluative practices which=20 value other ways of knowing and learning.

The principles of integral development serve to re-connect students=20 to themselves, their communities, and the natural world. In an era of technology and convenience, where young people are becoming=20 increasingly more isolated from interpersonal communication practices=20 and personal experiences with nature, educators can find in integral=20 development a justification for providing educational opportunities that are designed to build mutually enhancing human-human interconnections=20 and human-natural world interconnections.

The principles of differentiation, subjectivity and communion=20 provide an excellent theoretical basis for the purposes of discussion=20 about the assessment of specific teaching and learning practices that=20 require renewal and recreation within individual schools.

Integral development provides a philosophical framework that allows=20 for gradual transformation of existing educational practices. In=20 addition, teachers who are interested in developing a transformative=20 vision of education will need a structure by which they are supported=20 and valued as they attempt to implement suggestions for renewal=20 (especially in the area of spiritual development) that may meet with=20 resistance from parents and the greater community.

Because differentiation, subjectivity, and community are evolving=20 practices that are unique to the needs of each situation, integral=20 development provides a framework that will enhance dynamic re-ordering=20 and re-creating of educational objectives and practices in such a way=20 that the integrity of existing educational structures will not be=20 threatened.

Integral development employs the principles of differentiation,=20 subjectivity and communion to link transformative education to the wider processes of creativity within the universe in order to create a=20 foundation for a necessary paradigm shift to occur in Western education.

Specifically, integral development addresses the fo= llowing stated aims and goals of the Saskatchewan Education document:

1. CCT Aim: To=20 graduate persons who use the full range of thinking abilities needed for personal growth and full participation in diverse and changing=20 contexts.

CCT Goals: To create a climate of openness, mutual respect and support. To develop knowledge, values,=20 skills/abilities for critical and creative thinking, and to integrate=20 these creative dispositions to meet learning needs and real life=20 challenges.

2. PSD Aim: To support=20 children and youth in becoming authentic, confident and caring persons=20 who use their understanding of self, others and the natural world in=20 positive, sustaining ways.

PSD Goals: Students will=20 experience being valued and respected. They will understand, value and=20 care for self, others and the natural world, and they will contribute to co-operative endeavors, the growth of mutual understanding and the=20 creation of a better world for all.

3. CCT and PSD Integrated Aim: To support the development of persons who recognize the intrinsic value of caring, inclusive, democratic and sustainable communities and have=20 the abilities needed to act on this recognition.

CCT and PSD Integrated Goals: To=20 experience membership in caring, respectful and democratic classroom and school communities. To use personal integrity, =E2=80=9Cfair minded=E2=80= =9D critical=20 thinking and strong creative abilities to make decisions and to generate and evaluate alternatives related to moral values, issues and concerns. (Finney, 2008, pp. 4-10)

Each of these principles is further developed as follows:

Figure 1: Elements of Critical and Creative Thinking

Figure 2: Elements of Personal and Social Development

Figure 3: Elements of CCT and PSD Integrated

These elements suggest a structural framework for=20 development which could lead to generating renewal that re-frames a=20 movement and creates a shift from product-oriented, individualized=20 educational pursuits to organic, connected, and value-based educational=20 processes. Teaching objectives in all three specific areas are=20 consistent with the integral developmental principles of=20 differentiation, subjectivity, and communion. In the area of=20 differentiation, teachers are encouraged to treat each student as a=20 whole person of innate worth, to affirm unique abilities and potential,=20 and to appreciate =E2=80=9Cunique perspectives=E2=80=9D (Finney, 2008, p.= 39). In=20 addition, teachers are asked to embrace diversity within the context of=20 real life situations by emphasizing that there are many different ways=20 of doing things, and that difference is necessary and often enriching.=20 The following quotation appears as a reflection in the conclusion of the CCT section:

Because you are the unique product of evolution, culture, environment, fate, and your own quirky history, what is obvious and=20 humdrum to you is guaranteed to be thoroughly original....Paradoxically, the more you are yourself, the more universal your message.=20 (Nachmanovitch, 1990, as cited in Finney, 2008, p. 84)

In the PSD section, human diversity is addressed=20 in terms of gender, sexual orientation, abilities/disabilities,=20 culture/ethnicity/race/language, and income (Finney, 2008, p. 134), and=20 biodiversity is explored as an interdependent process necessary for=20 enrichment, continuance and renewal of life. The PSD section of=20 the renewal document also places emphasis on the integral development=20 principle of subjectivity. Teachers are encouraged to integrate=20 the arts and the natural environment in open-ended lessons that support=20 moral, emotional, and spiritual growth and foster a sense of awe and=20 mystery. In addition, they are encouraged to treated creativity as an internal process motivated by curiosity, determination, and passion=20 rather than by external rewards such as praise, recognition, and good=20 (Finney, 2008. p.97). The elements of PSD address the following=20 five developmental areas that pertain to three evolving principles of=20 integral development:

spiritual development=E2=80=94the concept of inner self;=20 exploration of thoughts, feelings and beliefs; questions of meaning and=20 purpose; appreciation and gratitude for all life has to offer;

identity development=E2=80=94self-understanding and self-care;= support for intellectual, emotional, relational and spiritual needs; emoti= onal intelligence;

character/moral development=E2=80=94responsibility for one=E2= =80=99s thoughts, words, actions; understanding of the difference between= a person and his or her behaviour;

diversity, interdependence, and sustainability=E2=80=94valuing= and=20 respecting human and biological diversity; developing understanding of=20 our social and environmental interdependence and the values and=20 abilities related to sustaining life; and

social interaction, skills and abilities=E2=80=94basic=20 interpersonal skills; respectful communication; cooperation; conflict=20 prevention and resolution, and social commitment, service and social=20 action.

The elements of integrated CCT/PSD focus on=20 all of the above areas; in addition, they target the development of=20 =E2=80=9Cvalues and abilities needed for the growth of communities that are= =20 caring, inclusive, democratic and sustainable=E2=80=9D (Finney, 2008, p.=20 255). They also foster communitarian thinking and dialogue, which=20 is founded upon a basic belief in, and commitment to the values of=20 mutuality, empowerment, reciprocity and sustainability within the global community. This commitment is consistent with O=E2=80=99Sullivan=E2= =80=99s (1999) communion principle, which centers on the development of the ecological self and the attainment of cosmological sense.

The visionary document Renewed Objectives for=20 the Common Essential Learning of Critical and Creative Thinking (CCT)=20 and Personal and Social Development (PSD) warrants a philosophical=20 framework that supports its implementation. Educators must take=20 seriously its comprehensive exploration of renewal processes for Western educational institutions, but the task seems monumental without a=20 framework that allows for assessment of present day practices and for=20 dynamic evolutionary movement within the existing educational=20 system. It makes sense that principles of O=E2=80=99Sullivan=E2=80=99= s (1999)=20 integral development framework be used to begin the =E2=80=9Chopeful=E2=80= =9D process of value-based social and spiritual renewal within the realm of education=20 at this critical moment in time. O=E2=80=99Sullivan (1999), in an ess= ay=20 entitled =E2=80=9CEmancipatory Hope=E2=80=9D refers to the message of Paulo= Friere,=20 whose words are appropriate to the implementation of Finney=E2=80=99s (2008= )=20 committee=E2=80=99s renewal vision within the democratic and multicultural= =20 nature of Saskatchewan society: =E2=80=9CWithout a minimum of hope, we cann= ot so much as start the struggle=E2=80=A6Hence the need for a kind of education= in=20 hope=E2=80=9D (Friere, 1996, p. 9). O=E2=80=99Sullivan=E2=80=99s (199= 9) own vision is not=20 unlike that of the Saskatchewan renewal committee; it makes sense that=20 his philosophical theories be used as a framework for developing a total school atmosphere in which people live their values and work together=20 for the common good. In this, the United Nations Decade of=20 Education for Sustainable Development (2005-2014), when educators are=20 being asked to integrate the principles, values and practices of=20 sustainable development into all aspects of education, Saskatchewan=E2=80= =99s=20 Ministry of Education has taken a leading role with the creation of this document, and has the potential to continue breaking ground in=20 transformative education with its implementation.

Integrated Value-based Education for the Future: A Personal Perspective

From personal experience as a former high=20 school teacher in Saskatchewan, I believe in the values that the=20 Saskatchewan Ministry of Education document promotes, and I am convinced that education of the future must provide more opportunities for=20 value-based, integrated learning and teaching. In my last teaching assignment in an inner city high school with a large Aboriginal and=20 multicultural population, the environment in my classroom was such that=20 each person was recognized as a capable, contributing, and connected=20 member of a respectful community. In that class, which was=20 composed of students from all academic levels, we redefined the word=20 success to mean that each individual has a unique set of gifts and=20 talents that he or she can discover and utilize to make the world a=20 better place. Students tapped into their own creativity; they=20 connected with nature; they embraced silence and stillness; they=20 experimented with =E2=80=9Cother=E2=80=9D ways of knowing and learning, and= they=20 reawakened their sense of mystery and awe. Most of all, they=20 recognized (many for the first time) that they had something valuable to offer to each other, the community and the greater world. Many of my students were people who had not been motivated to =E2=80=9Cachieve=E2= =80=9D in=20 school previously because they did not perform well on paper and pencil=20 tests, and this lack of success contributed to the high dropout rate in=20 the school. In 3 years and 6 semesters of using a foundation that=20 drew on value-based philosophy, not one of my students failed or dropped out of my class. Two research projects connected to the class=20 indicated that the elements of social and personal development, critical and creative thinking, and spiritual and moral discernment were the=20 strengths in the process. At that time, I did not know about=20 integral development, but I have since found that the principles of=20 differentiation, subjectivity, and communion provide a strong=20 philosophical support for the kind of integrated learning that my class=20 provided and that the Saskatchewan Ministry of Education document=20 promotes.

I believe that all teachers should become aware of the CCT/PSD document, and they should learn how to use it. That=20 is why the document is required reading in my Educational Foundations=20 class, which is entitled, Perspectives in Educational Values. I=20 have challenged my students to use this document as a resource to create the foundations for safe, inclusive, and welcoming classrooms, to=20 envision a mutually enhancing human-nature interconnectedness, to=20 investigate teaching and assessment practices that foster and utilize=20 multiple ways of learning and knowing, and to integrate value-based=20 perspectives into their philosophies of education. It is my hope=20 that these teachers of the future will develop a =E2=80=9Cgenerative vision= that will challenge their own creativity in the specific educational context of their own work=E2=80=9D (O=E2=80=99Sullivan, 1999, p. 9) in order that= they might=20 =E2=80=9Cawake to the splendor of the universe [and] ignite life in others= =E2=80=9D=20 (Swimme, 2001, p. 61).

References

Abram, D. (1996). The spell of the sensuous. New York, NY: Vintage Books.

Berry, T. (1988). The dream of the earth.= Los Angeles, CA: Sierra Club Books.

Conlon, J. (1990). Geo-Justice. Winnipeg,= MB: Hignell Printing Ltd.

Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. Norwood, MA: McMillan Company.

Finney, S. (2008). Renewed objectives for the common essential learning of critical and creative thinking (CCT) and=20 personal and social development (PSD). Regina, SK: Saskatchewan Minist= ry of Education.

Freire, P. (1996). Pedagogy of hope= . New York, NY: Continuum.

Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of mind. New= York, NY: Basic Books.

Garrison, J. (1997). Dewey and Eros= . New York, NY: Teacher=E2=80=99s College Press.

Kessler, R. (2005). Nourishing Adolescent=20 Spirituality. In J. Miller, S. Karsten, D. Denton, D. Orr, &=20 I. Colalillo Kates (Eds.), Holistic learning. Albany, NY: State Un= iversity of New York Press.

Miller, J., Karsten, S., Denton, D., Orr, D., &= ; Colalillo Kates, I. (Eds.) (2005). Holistic learning. Albany, NY= : State University of New York Press.

Moore, T. (2005). Educating for the Soul. In= J. Miller, S. Karsten, D. Denton, D. Orr, & I. Colalillo Kates (Eds.),= Holistic learning. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press= .

Orr, D. (2205). Minding the Soul in=20 Education. In J. Miller, S. Karsten, D. Denton, D. Orr, & I.=20 Colalillo Kates (Eds.), Holistic learning. Albany, NY: State = University of New York Press.

O=E2=80=99Sullivan, E. (1999). Transformative= learning. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.

O=E2=80=99Sullivan, E. (2005). Emancipatory hope.&= nbsp; In J. Miller, S. Karsten, D. Denton, D. Orr, & I. Colalillo Kates= (Eds.), Holistic learning. Albany, NY: State University of New Yo= rk Press.

Purpel, D. & McLaurin, W. (2004). Reflecti= ons on the moral and spiritual crisis in Education. New York, NY: Pete= r Lang Publishing.

Swimme, B. (2001) The universe is a green drag= on. Rochester: Bear & Company.

Swimme, B., & Berry, T. (1992). The univer= se story: An autobiography from planet Earth. San Francisco, CA: Harpe= r and Row.

Wilson, L. (2005). Listening to ancient voices. In= J. Miller, S. Karsten, D. Denton, D. Orr, & I. Colalillo Kates (Eds.),= Holistic learning. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press= .

Issues

=20 =20 =20

=20

Issue - : 16(1)

=20

Issue - : 15(2)

=20

Issue - : 16(2)

=20

Issue - : 17(1)

=20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20

Integral Development and Educational Renewal in Saskatche= wan:
A Visionary Process

Twelve Assumptions: Assessment and Analysis Warranted

Mechanistic World View: The Root of Educational Crisis Fr= om Two Perspectives

The Integral Development Framework: A Transformative Visi= on of Education

Educational Renewal: Towards Critical and Creative Thinki= ng, Personal and Social Development, and a Global and Planetary Ethic

Integrated Value-based Education for the Future: A Personal Perspective

References

in education

Integral Developmen= t and Educational Renewal in Saskatchewan: A Visionary Process

Subscribe

Issues

User login

in education

Integral Developmen= t and Educational Renewal in Saskatchewan: A Visionary Process

Integral Development and Educational Renewal in Saskatche= wan: A Visionary Process

Twelve Assumptions: Assessment and Analysis Warranted

Mechanistic World View: The Root of Educational Crisis Fr= om Two Perspectives

The Integral Development Framework: A Transformative Visi= on of Education

Educational Renewal: Towards Critical and Creative Thinki= ng, Personal and Social Development, and a Global and Planetary Ethic

Integrated Value-based Education for the Future: A Personal Perspective

References

Subscribe

Issues

User login

Integral Development and Educational Renewal in Saskatche= wan:
A Visionary Process